Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discoperi Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discoperi Inc.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notbale tech firm/startup. no meaningful independent coverage Praxidicae (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands - all sources unreliable, promotional, self-sourced or all of these - David Gerard (talk) 12:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I totally agree about the state of the sourcing. All of it is promotional, primary, or not reliable. So, as things currently are this is a clear delete. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Many of the sources are also just routine coverage of events or other things they are involved in, rather than coverage that has enough depth to pass organization notability. - Whisperjanes (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.