Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunderberg Creek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 08:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunderberg Creek

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mass-produced article about nondescript creek. It is said that "Major geographical and geological features featured on maps, such as ... rivers" are notable, but this is not major and is smaller than a river. Geschichte (talk) 08:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Note: The criterion the nominator is using is incorrect. They are using WP:MAPOUTCOMES, which is not a criteria but rather a general AfD list. The criteria that should be applied here is WP:GEOLAND criterion 4 "Named natural features". Curbon7 (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is that MAPOUTCOMES was invoked by the deprodder. Geschichte (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's WP:NGEO that says maps and tables alone do not establish notability, and this only sources the map name database GNIS, one of many mass-produced by this user without further significant coverage. Reywas92^Talk 14:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Small creek fails GEOLAND and GNG. In addition to the issues mentioned above, the deprodder failed to verify the unlikely claim that this is a "river"; the describes it as a "stream". –dlthewave ☎ 16:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.