Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Burns (blogger)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Burns (blogger)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see anything at Eric Burns (blogger) that makes him notable. Most of the content was added by an anonymous IP address in 2005 [1]. Tom Ruen (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:23, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of coverage that would pass GNG. Webcomic creators and developers are very rarely notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I would count The Telegraph and "Graphic Novels and Comics in Libraries and Archives" at least as a start of notability, although I agree it could use more. BOZ (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The 25 Webcomics and Libraries source mentions the subject once in passing, which is hardly significant coverage. The newspaper is a localized source, and going by the headline (which refers to the subject as "New Hampshire man") it's a local spotlight, not significant coverage. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.