Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Kattelus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Kattelus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only a few WP:ROUTINE sources about signings and such. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by not playing in a high enough league for long enough to presume notability and has won no individual awards that I can find. Yosemiter (talk) 15:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The product of an editor who ultimately received a community ban on new article creation for many hundreds of NN article to bump up his page creation count. As with the vast majority of these creations, the subject here is a journeyman hockey player in the mid-minors with an undistinguished career and no awards, noteworthy or otherwise. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 16:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY, WP:N and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 13:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.