Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Academy of Paediatrics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 05:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

European Academy of Paediatrics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:ORG. WP:ORG says: "An organization is not notable merely because notable persons are associated with it. An organization is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." This page needs to be deleted. Topjur02 (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Topjur02 (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Topjur02 (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Topjur02 (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is weak, but the organisation is notable. However most of the sources are behind paywalls. Rathfelder (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable organization with potential to pass general notability guidelines. The article just needs attention and perhaps folks at the Wikipedia Library can help with access to the databases. Missvain (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 00:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: an international org -- with a 60-year history and representing national pediatrics orgs -- is not a flash in the pan. I've found some sources that support notability notability: Guide to Paediatric Clinical Research and Neonatology: A Practical Approach to Neonatal Diseases. --K.e.coffman (talk) 19:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The first of K.e.coffman's two book sources provides non-trivial independent coverage, as does Wyder, Corinne, "EAP – European academy of pediatrics" (PDF), Paediatrica, 25 (4): 25. I think that's enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.