Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmsite.org
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep, confusingly enough. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 02:48, Jan. 29, 2006
Keep - doesn't fit WP:WEB Chris M. 05:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote changed, per Pinktulip. Chris M. 03:25, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a link directory, and there's little that can be said about this site that is not already in this very small article. Still a nice site, might be useful for referencing movie articles. Tinus 20:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as notable based on Alexa Traffic Rank for filmsite.org: 13,904 . —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 05:10Z
- Keep Wikipedia, if it cannot provide all of the information directly, should help the user find additional informaiton. It helps Template:Filmsite to be more uniform with the IMDb template. -- Pinktulip 07:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I prefer to see Alexa rating of 10000 or more for website notability; this was the guideline on WP:WEB for a long while before it was removed. Stifle 12:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest you take a second look, and this time, look for not just volume, but value and information density. This site has it. I am sure that there are plenty of porno sites that have a rating over 10000. Your logic is that they should have a higher priority to getting an article? -- Pinktulip 01:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Volume and information density would be valid reasons to include this site in a link directory. I would instead suggest the 'endorsed by Roger Ebert' statement as a reason for it to fit the WP:WEB guideline, if there would be references to back it up. Tinus 21:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The Roger Ebert comment is present on the homepage of filmsite.org. Tintin Talk 21:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not really a reference, it would prove 'The site owner considers himself endorsed by...'. I added the best reference I could find on Roger Ebert's site (the others state either something about Tim Dirks; not about the site, state 'Dialogue taken from the great site ...' or state nothing about either). Still thin though. Tinus 23:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The Roger Ebert comment is present on the homepage of filmsite.org. Tintin Talk 21:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Volume and information density would be valid reasons to include this site in a link directory. I would instead suggest the 'endorsed by Roger Ebert' statement as a reason for it to fit the WP:WEB guideline, if there would be references to back it up. Tinus 21:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Pinktulip. Tintin Talk 23:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.