Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forensics (musician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 03:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Forensics (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability per WP:GNG and WP:BAND. {{db-band}} declained. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: "Founded the '111' movement" might be evidence of notability if we had other sources that there was such a movement, and it was notable. "Ran Methodology Recordings" might be evidence of notability if we had a source for the claim, and Methodology Recordings had some significance. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 00:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.