Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GTC FX
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GTC FX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet the notability guideline for companies. Some of the sources in the article are questionable. Frost 03:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and United Arab Emirates. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet NCORP — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - as said above, does not meet WP:NCORP Mia a data witch (chat) 12:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Other competitors already have their own entries. User:Martinolau 16:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- You have an incomplete paid editing disclosure on your user page. Please can you confirm for whom you have been paid to edit? Also, "others have a page so this one deserves one too" is not a valid argument. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.