Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Be Dragons (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The linked draft should be sent to WP:MFD to be discussed on its own merits. clpo13_(talk) 16:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here Be Dragons (company)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:CORP; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions, and / or WP:SPIP. A spot check of references reveal that they do not mention either "Here be Dragons" nor "DIVISION7", such as The Verge; instead, they discuss the projects that the company produced, w/o mentioning the latter. Created by Special:Contributions/Meramiao with no other contributions outside this topic.

Agreeing that Here Be Dragons does not meet WP:CORP and should be deleted. Norway idealist18 (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A draft has been recently created for the new name of the company by accounts that only edited related subjects (Special:Contributions/Interiordesign girl 179 & Special:Contributions/Gabbybrownnyc); I recommend deleting it as well:

Draft:DIVISION7

-- K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another great example of Notability is not inherited. While this organization associates with subject matter that may be notable, the references fail the criteria for establishing the notability of the organization itself. Topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very little in the way of real sources. Most of whats there seems to documenting their own work history. No real notability. Curious how a new draft has been created. I hope its not the start of a new pattern. Delete both scope_creep^Talk 10:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.