Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabel Cruz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Geschichte (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel Cruz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N Manabimasu (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Manabimasu (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She was a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This old version of the article shows notability more clearly. I am not sure that the claim the old version was a copyvio was correct. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eastmain. Mccapra (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:Prof on citations and more. No rationale for deletion given. A wp:trout for the nominator who should carry out WP:Before before making more nominations in this area. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Strong keep. I had this topic on the forefront of my to-create list after hearing yesterday by word of mouth that she had died, and had held off from doing it already only because I did not have any public source for her death. As a Fellow of the AAAS [1], Distinguished Professor [2], and well-cited researcher [3] she passes WP:PROF#C3, #C5, and #C1 at least. There is also some recent press for her research [4]. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Solid citation record with h-index of 37 (usually sufficient for NPROF#1, but depends on specific sub-field in CS). Passes NPROF#3 (FAAAS) and NPROF#5 (distinguished professor at UIC).--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 07:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Solidly notable, with FAAAS and Distinguished Professorship [5]. PamD 10:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.