Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jee Chahay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Faakhir Mehmood. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 04:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jee Chahay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing turns up. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak merge with article on Faakhir Mehmood. Vorbee (talk) 11:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep there's enough coverage in the references in the article; merging to Faakhir Mehmood as an editorial decision would be reasonable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Faakhir Mehmood. A search brings up [1] and [2], both of which are in the article, but not much else in terms of coverage in reliable sources. The other two sources in the article provide coverage, but they do not appear to be reliable to establish notability, as per Wikipedia's standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.