Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kira Hara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, with salt. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kira Hara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find a single reliable source covering the game. Delete per WP:GNG. Author contested WP:PROD. Odie5533 (talk) 22:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

note—check article history if things look weird, article creator just removed afd template, although i restored it. (and warned) — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two-line article. Zero sources. No news hits. Regular google hits almost all for other stuff. There does seem to have been a bulletin board discussion on it, once. Also, there's a Facebook page that might be related. Fails notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I prodded this in June, and it was deleted then. My rationale was "Can not verify the existence of this game, or of its stated developer, let alone find a reliable source. The claim that it was banned in South Korea should be easily sourced if true. Further, the article states it was for the Mac OS, but the stated release date predates the Macintosh by two years. Dubious. WP:N". The dubious details I noted are not included in this recreated version, but the delete-worthy notability arguments would appear to still hold. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 08:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I think it should be deleted and protected from recreation. --Odie5533 (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.