Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Crummett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Crummett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record producer lacking non-trivial support. Article references are all primary in nature or are just listings of the individual's name. Appears to fail WP:Notability (music) reddogsix (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crummett is certainly notable within the post-hardcore genre... his records with Dance Gavin Dance alone are hugely influential in that particular scene. There is no reason why someone such as Brian McTernan should get an article if Kris Crummett cannot have one as well. Beachdude42 02:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Crummett produced many billboard 200 albums. His name mentioned a lot on indie music sites/magazines like alternative press, absolutepunk, lambgoat.35forMVP (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - How does this support Wikipedia based notability? reddogsix (talk) 13:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources such as the "associated press" and "alternative press" might prove nobility --198.110.176.210 (talk) 13:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There is no "associated press" reference and the "alternative press" references are only listings of his name - this is trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 13:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 13:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.