Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuwaiti Classico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kuwaiti Classico

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A quick internet search reveals nothing more than Wikipedia mirror websites. The article itself is nothing more than a collection of results; refer to WP:NRIVALRY and WP:NOTSTATS. No evidence that WP:GNG is met. Spiderone 12:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 12:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - why delete it after all this time it has been on Wikipedia and has been updated regularly, it is well known just ask for references and it is well know if researched well it is even listed in the Arabic Wikipedia, this article has been on Wikipedia for years and has been updated regularly and is up to date with its information . . Khalid Sadeq 21:09, 23 October 2016 (KSA)
Delete - no evidence this rivalry is notable and is discussed by reliable sources. Eldumpo (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Eldumpo: I can only see one reliable source. [1] The other sources don't have any prose whatsoever and one of them is the Arabic language Wikipedia which is obviously not reliable. @Khalid sadeq: please delete one of your keep votes; you can't vote twice. Spiderone 07:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of sufficient coverage of the notion of a "rivalry" not just match reporting of individual games, to indicate GNG. One source isn't enough. There may well be additional sourcing in Arabic, but these need to be presented here and translated. Fenix down (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Kante4 (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.