Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levels of organization (ecology) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Biological organisation. MBisanz ^talk 20:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Levels of organization (ecology)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This can easily be found on Ecology. RES2773 (talk) 00:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge content to Ecology if it's not already there. Bradv 18:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It;'s one of the basic ecological concepts, though it needs expansion. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge - needs improvement, but is notable enough. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Actually upon review merging might be the best option. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Biological organisation. Convert the Levels of Organization disambiguation to the page Integrative level and create a hatnote to the page biological organization. Also, a Levels of organization page should be created to also become a redirect. Oldag07 (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Several various ideas here. Of note is that two different merge targets have been suggested. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and consider merging targets afterwards as there are no serious needs for deletion and this is likely an acceptable search. SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Biological organisation, content fork. Sandstein 17:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Biological organisation. I'd say merge, but it looks like all the content is already there.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.