Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wrestling championships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect both to Championship (professional wrestling) . lifebaka (talk - contribs) 18:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of wrestling championships

These pages were created by a new user. I have declined to speedy delete them. I would like AfD participants to consider whether we would like to have these articles - obviously they both need improvement. Richard Cavell (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 08:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Useless repetitive list. Content listed elsewhere (Championship (professional wrestling))^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 08:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect both to Championship (professional wrestling) since it looks like all the information is contained there (if I'm wrong, then first Merge any extra to that article). Olaf Davis | Talk 10:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. I add my praise for the nominator, who has pointed out that the article author is new to Wikipedia. Welcome to Wikipedia, Sid xx, and you're encouraged to keep contributing. As the template for new articles says, it's often a good idea to see if the subject is covered elsewhere. Mandsford (talk) 00:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE List of wrestling championships and keep List of wrestling titles.Sid xx
- Would you like to explain why you think one is delete-worthy and not the other, Sid? Olaf Davis | Talk 09:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, I'd really rather see a delete as the info is already covered elsewhere (and because I'd hate to see more pointless redirects), but this seems to be where the discussion is going. Nikki311 03:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirects are cheap: if having one there prevents someone else from creating the article six months down the line and another AfD for it, the amount of time saved will be well worth it. Olaf Davis | Talk 09:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.