Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loud (Half Japanese album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Loud (Half Japanese album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This album article should be deleted (or eventually merged) because it fells Wikipedia:NMG#Albums. The album has no notability because it didn't chart at all or has a single that performed well on international charts. Additionally the article has no information about its background, recording, composition or reception. — Tomica (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 15. Snotbot t • c » 23:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. 19:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:UGLY. The album predates the internet era but was reviewed upon its release and has garnered press since. — AjaxSmack 02:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The album is sufficiently notable. The article should be kept and improved. --Michig (talk) 07:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per sources in the article; this topic passes WP:NALBUMS. A classic case of 'Afd is not cleanup'. Till 02:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.