Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOLPay
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- MOLPay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I stand by my original prod rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you," Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: I've added the original PROD rationale since it got cut off. 04:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokyogirl79 (talk • contribs)
- @Tokyogirl79: It was intended to be omitted. Through I did forget to add that it was deprodded by creator who added more sources ([1]); unfortunately I do not consider them reliable enough to warrant me changing my opinion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ah- you should probably still include it in some format in the deletion discussion so people coming into the AfD know your reasons for deletion immediately, without looking at the article history. You can remove it if you like, though. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 19:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Rcsprinter123 (cackle) @ 19:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.