Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Ramola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Given the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tbt1849, this should probably be considered closer to a soft delete and will be restored on request. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Ramola

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His biography has been published through the media and there is no such big thinking that proves them to be worthwhile. talk:Tbt1849|(talk) 12:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. The current references consist of routine listings, three dead links, two interviews, and a Hindustan Times article quoting Ramola. This article also quotes Ramola. This article and this article appear to be about a workshop held by Ramola, but I do not believe they are enough to meet WP:GNG — the former is only two paragraphs long. userdude 06:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because I think this could benefit from firmer delete consensus. However, if pinged without other !votes I'll Soft Delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looking at the Article , more links are dead,The current references consist of routine listings, three dead links, two interviews, and a Hindustan Times article quoting Ramola. This article also quotes Ramola. This article and this article appear to be about a workshop held by Ramola, but I do not believe they are enough to meet the former is only two paragraphs long. userdude 06:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)The current references consist of routine listings, three dead links, two interviews, and a Hindustan Times article quoting Ramola. This article also quotes Ramola. This article it seems that it has been promoted automatically, most of the links are interviews or the maximum has been shown to their work. Whatever is given by thinking, it seems that there are trees. Wikipedia does not say that you are through Wikipedia If you promote yourself from this page, I request should be deleted now.[reply]

KLM014 (talk) 05:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This page is designed to promote itself. There is no major independence source, so it does not prove that it is a notable person. This page should be deleted.and many links dead

Tbt1849 (talk) 08:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.