Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark A. Fischer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark A. Fischer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this subject meets the notability standards--not a high-flying job, and no secondary coverage. Dr Aaij (talk) 23:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject does not appear to meet notability standards. Original article appears to have been an autobiography. OccamzRazor (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fischer appears to be the only active attorney at Duane Morris to have a biographical article, despite that the firm has around 600 lawyers. He was also the only active attorney to have an article at his former firm of Fish & Richardson, which has over 400 lawyers. Information in his article does not substantiate that he would have any greater standing than any of the other active lawyers at these two firms. An internet search found nothing mentioning him except law firm profiles, which most lawyers in the country have. OccamzRazor (talk) 22:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no real assertion of notability. Mangoe (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.