Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Newell bibliography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Martin Newell (musician)#Bibliography. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 00:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Newell bibliography

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN, no evidence this body of work has received significant coverage as a group. --Pontificalibus 11:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This isn't the appropriate venue. This is a merge proposal, not a deletion request. Pburka (talk) 13:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The main article already contains a suitable list, I’m not arguing for a merge.—--Pontificalibus 13:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then we'd just redirect it to that section. Still not a proper deletion request. postdlf (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've clarified my rationale to make it clear that this is a valid AfD discussion.----Pontificalibus 14:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to parent article and redirect to section. I also don't think it merits a split due to size, but publisher and ISBN are certainly "suitable" facts to include for works listed in a bibliography, and the list currently at Martin Newell (musician) just has titles and years. postdlf (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Martin Newell is a notable poet, columnist and author whos work has been published on multiple occasions in major UK newspapers. And Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works states that splitting out bibliographies from main articles "is warranted if the list becomes so long that its inclusion in the main article would be unsuitable". memphisto
Keep. Merging his bibliography into the main article but leaving his discography separate would unbalance the main article: there would be significantly more words dedicated to his writing than to his music, for which he's just as well known. However, I'd consider merging the bibliography and the discography. Pburka (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/merge Books are already at Martin_Newell_(musician)#Bibliography, article is absolutely not too long to require a split. No reason for separate page just to list publishers and ISBNs. Reywas92^Talk 16:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge without a redirect to Martin_Newell_(musician)#Bibliography, no need to have this separate from main article ie. its not WP:TOOLONG, publishing details definitely needs to be added though. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.