Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Magolnick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g5, created by sock of banned User:LumCel. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Magolnick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to assert notability, but, just as you think it's there it runs away as water through a sieve. Sources, yes, but oh so primary and oh so unreliable. WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT of a non notable but enterprising gentleman. Fiddle Faddle 14:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Graaah, beat me by 5 mins :P. Very poorly sourced BLP (almost all of the references are user generated) of a seemingly non-notable author, who apparently just set up a company. Written like an advert, but I decided not to speedy delete due to the number of (poor) sources. Benboy00 (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.