Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milk Lizard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ire Works. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Milk Lizard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, as the single failed to chart. I did remove an edit that redirected this article to Ire Works, but that was when I was new in town. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 18:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pn - and a Google search doesn't really show any reliable sources Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 01:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ire Works. The song does not appear to meet WP:NSONG, which suggests that such instances should redirect to the parent album. Gong show 14:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ire Works - The usual practice is to redirect to the album the track belongs in. No indications of independent notability. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.