Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modica Group
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Modica Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:GNG. Limited news coverage, all but one item was for a single case where they loaned money to take over another company. Everything else is just directories and similar sites. Mako001 (C) (T) (The Alternate Mako) 12:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (C) (T) (The Alternate Mako) 12:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (C) (T) (The Alternate Mako) 12:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. --IdiotSavant (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Orphaned article for 11 years and one old citation? Not notable. Platonk (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.