Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moz (marketing software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moz (marketing software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable SEO company. Sources used include Forbes Contributers blog (see listing below WP:FORBES), founder's book, companies website, and other SEO blogs and products. Only reliable source used is NYT, which barely mentions the founder and the company and in an unrelated context. Similar rationale to WP:Articles for deletion/Ahrefs and WP:Articles for deletion/Yoast. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 17:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A marketing company which knows how to make wiki article. :) No surprise this made into wikipedia. definite purpose is promotional only, written by some professionals who knows how to trick wiki policies and make an article. similar to other non-notable tech startups. Light2021 (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non notable software. Accesscrawl (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MILL, WP:NCORP, and WP:SNOW. Literally any Internet rando can go on LinkedIn and take an assessment to "prove" they know SEO buzzwords. Bearian (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.