Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netherlands national cyclo-cross team
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Netherlands national cyclo-cross team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The topic seems to be not really a team, but more a selection of riders that can change within a year. I can't find any reference on this topic. I don't think the article right now is notable and besides of that it's outdated. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 24. Snotbot t • c » 17:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per nom, these seem to be individuals who were selected for an unspecified world championships. I imagine different riders might be selected for different contests, therefore this isn't a permanent team in any sense. But this is all speculation until someone can find a reliable selection of sources! Failing that, the article serves little purpose. A "List of Dutch cyclo-cross riders" might be a more plausible article ... Sionk (talk) 22:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.