Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nomad Capitalist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomad Capitalist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the WP:CORPDEPTH test. This company is not listed on the NYSE and not listed on NASDAQ.

Looking at the references in this article:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-desirable-passports-earth-don-080006049.html includes a mention of "view of "Nomad Capitalist", a firm that recently ranked 199 countries corresponding to their value of citizenship". So a website described another website?
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/nomad-capitalist#/entity TechCrunch is arguably a reliable reference. Shirt58 (talk) 11:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PompeyTheGreat (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Personally of the opinion that Nomad Capitalist is fairly notable. Has been in multiple online news reports and seems to be pretty major in terms of offshoring, although the article as is has a promotional tone.PompeyTheGreat (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nomad Capitalist has been covered by Yahoo Finance. The company also received an article in Bloomberg and an article in CNN Money. This gives his firm sufficient depth of coverage from reliable sources to be notable. Knox490 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete -- A7 material. I requested such. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's not worth the two sentences it takes up on Wikipedia. Not notable. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 16:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.