Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneByOne
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Ex-gay movement. GedUK 12:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OneByOne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. No sources specifically about the organization found. Thargor Orlando (talk) 23:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge back into Ex-gay movement, from where it was originally split off, IIRC. Jclemens (talk) 02:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tito☸Dutta 16:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Ex-gay movement, per JClemens.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.