Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only A Poor Old Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Merge and Redirect to Carl Barks. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 04:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable story by a notable author. 766 Ghits. Rory096(block) 17:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and mention at Carl Barks. -- Saberwyn 12:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to Carl Barks. Stifle (talk) 23:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Fang Aili 說嗎? 00:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fang Aili 說嗎? 00:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Carl Barks. Kimchi.sg | talk 00:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious merge I don't think you needed AfD for that. Just be bold next time. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect seems to be the best coarse of action. SorryGuy 04:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, no merge, very notable person. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 04:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The person already has a good, long article. The article up for deletion is for a single story he wrote, not for the article about the man himself. --Icarus 05:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Carl Barks -- there's nothing to merge. dbtfztalk 04:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no purpose in redirecting this, as the only article that links to it is the author's own article. All a redirect would accomplish would be to create a link in that article that redirected right back to that same article. If it had other articles linking to it I'd vote to redirect, but in this case it's pointless and would only waste the time of anyone reading the author's article who wished to see what this article had to say. --Icarus 05:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Carl Barks. All Carl Barks stories are notable, but there must be something to actually say about them. JIP | Talk 17:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and use this page as a redirect to Carl Banks. Obviously mentions of Only a Poor Old Man in Carl Banks article should not be wikinlinked, and it would be a good idea to state this on the talk page for Carl Banks. If anyone wants to turn Only a Poor Old Man into a proper article, then that would be a different matter, but it doesn't seem as though anyone does. Tyrenius 17:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.