Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osseon Therapeutics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Osseon Therapeutics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, unsourced Carl Fredrik^talk 12:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article which has been tended by a sequence of WP:SPA accounts. The provided links are poor, predominantly press releases, and my searches are finding only more routine announcements about patents, corporate funding, etc. Enough to confirm this as a company going about its business, but I am not seeing the substantial coverage required for WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 10:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wondered why an article with so many edits still had no real substantial content- the main text is just 24 words in length. Looking through the history (as AllyD has already observed) there have been a sequence of SPAs tinkering with the page, adding multiple external links and a list of products to the infobox. There have been improvement tags on the page since a few days after it was created 6 years ago but the issues were never fixed. The Becker website link states that they are a "$14 million start-up company was launched by the University of Northern California". Searching for coverage of the company reveals a few press releases, but I didn't see any coverage that I would make me think that the WP:CORPDEPTH criteria had been met. Notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.