Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Owup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I42 (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTDIC. See [1]. — Rankiri (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete don't see significant news coverage of the term, so I second the people above. David V Houston (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even though I am definitley under paid yet over worked.--The Phantom In Church (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find no notable use of the term as described other than urban dictionary definitions, and Wikipedia isn't a dictionary -- Boing! said Zebedee 11:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's snowing!--Straw Man's Hat (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Words not in Wiktionary [2] do not make suitable encyclopedia articles. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.