Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Petrocelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to EMMA for Peace. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 22:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Petrocelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with weak primary sources. Seems NN or WP:TOOSOON, with claim of notability as "co-founder" of NN committee, plus borderline notable EMMA for Peace. Widefox; talk 15:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC) (note creator is a blocked sock, of improperly disclosed paid editor User:Nmwalsh recently blocked for socking, so the presumption is this is an undisclosed paid article violating the WP:TOU. Also EMMA for Peace created by Khocon who claims COI on Paolo Petrocelli at User:Khocon). Widefox; talk 15:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The sources including La Voce Di New York, Yale University, Ganzomag aren't primary. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 06:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This seems very much like part of a walled garden. The organizations used to claim notability don't seem notable in their own right.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 22:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to EMMA for Peace, based on current sourcing. The three best sources are mentioned above. Jury's out on whether La Voce di NY is reliable without doing some digging on its editor's background, but at least it looks clean. Yale is not an independent source, as they hired him as a visiting fellow. Ganzo looks like a regular blog—not reliable. We're left with other junk coverage. I'd redirect to EMMA for Peace, though it looks like that will be up for deletion too (better a redirect than nothing), and there's nothing to redirect to re: his role in the National Commissions for UNESCO. czar 22:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as specified, as a compromise. DGG ( talk ) 01:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.