Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Imray (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 13:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Imray

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY as not played professional. Only a trial with Hibs and never started for the Wellington Phoenix. Team Wellington doesn't play in a professional league. Not enough for WP:GNG.

Edit as I see this is third nominations, I'm surprised it was kept in the previous ones but note both where no concensus. Really all the articles are the same thing about his trial and he hasn't gone on to do anything else and/or play professional. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 01:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFOOTY as I can not find him going onto the field for a pro team. WP:GNG is harder. But if you don't reach football notability, you can't reach general notability for your football. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 04:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)).[reply]
Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 5 7 12:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I cannot find reliable coverage which I am going to agree with these two, the article fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Sheldybett (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. I wasn't convinced about the GNG arguments at the last AFD and I'm still not. Giant Snowman 11:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.