Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Supernaw (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Phillip Supernaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This spent just short of one year in the article incubator,and had no substantive edits at all in that time and no edits of any kind in several months. He does not seem to have become any more notable in that time, having been placed on the injured list without ever appearing in a major league game. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails both WP:NCOLLATH and WP:NGRIDIRON, based on his bio. He apparently has not played in any professional games, has not won any awards, or otherwise attracted national media attention as an individual. Braincricket (talk) 02:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with previous comments. Clearly fails to meet either WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:NCOLLATH. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not seeing the level of coverage we like to see to pass WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.