Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postearly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Postearly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most sources are not independent or reliable. wwwhatsnew blog post [1] is probably independent, but one source won't make it for WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability. As to the refs mentioned by Fran.ziro above - blog posts fail WP:RS, the Listin Diario is an article on how the company was selected to go to "Seedstars Summit" in Switzerland but fails to provide any in-depth info on the company (fails CORPDEPTH), and the Forbes reference is 3 sentences that provides a short company description in a list of other company descriptions for their "30 Promising Companies" article. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 21:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.