Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Principality (comics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long list of non-notable Marvel characters. Seems the term "Principality" itself is a non-notable term that Marvel recently invented to try to group these minor characters into some sort of classification system. All of the links lead to other lists where if you are lucky there might be a stub describing the character. It's an endless mess of list poorly written and unencyclopedic, unrefernced, totally random, and unorganized lists that were all created after the Pokemon fallout to try to group together things to avoid deletion. There is far too much coverage of a minutia of details trying to lump all this stuff together to try to make things pass muster and avoid AFD Ridernyc (talk) 20:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This could be something significant in the future depending on what Marvel does with it and if it sticks around, but right now there's not enough information out there to get a good idea what this is all about. 42of8 (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.