Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Meager

Rachael Meager

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find indepth coverage in google news or books to meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF, not a full professor and citations count is relatively low. Also an orphan article, which is unusual for an acadenic. LibStar (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Economics, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No pass yet of WP:Prof. Maybe WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NPROF. No WP:SIGCOV of the subject. They may become notable in the future, but not today.4meter4 (talk) 00:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Single-digit h-index and minor academic awards not good enough yet to show a pass of WP:PROF, no other signs of notability in evidence. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. With a PhD in 2017, I think this is just a case of too-early career. There's one or two highly cited papers, then a big drop off. No prejudice to recreating in a few years. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:TOOSOON, not notable (at least yet), no visible impact of their contributions yet, no major achievement, and lack significant coverage. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 06:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - they lack significant coverage and it’s too soon in their career. Bearian (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]