Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Reverie (video game). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Rainbite

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rainbite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 14:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to Reverie (video game). Only one of the sources actually says anything about the company, but the rest have no actual content to them. Fails WP:COMPANY. I mention the redirect because the game _does_ seem notable, so it's possible anyone looking for the company would want to see that article. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect to Reverie (video game) per Annyong's rationale. Does not meet WP:GNG and fails WP:ORGCRIT. I have also noticed a banner that mentioned some sort of WP:CONFLICT on the article, probably a subtle indication of an attempt at WP:PROMOTION. Sparkl^talk 02:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.