Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reckless Behavior: Caught on Tape
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Reckless Behavior: Caught on Tape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no significant coverage after multiple searches including on Newspapers.com. SL93 (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Television. SL93 (talk) 23:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New Zealand and United States of America. North America1000 12:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NFILM. I too could fine no reviews or other sources with significant coverage. I did find one book on cyber bullying where the film was briefly discussed, but it wasn't in-depth enough to count as significant coverage.4meter4 (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.