Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome Chambers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rome Chambers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Played a single, unremarkable game over 120 years ago. No other information can be found on him and the MLB's own website has the exact same info. Extremely doubtful that this player meets notability standards. Lindsey40186 (talk) 01:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Baseball, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some newspaper coverage: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. In-depth SIGCOV over 100 years after his death: [6] / [7]. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If final outcome is not keep, then it should be redirected to Atlanta Braves all-time roster#C. Rgrds. --BX (talk) 02:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - besides the newspaper coverage found by BeanieFan above, Chambers is also profiled in The Rank and File by David Nemec, and thus meets GNG. Hatman31 (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Newspapers.com coverage presented above. Also I find [8] as the second result. I find the lack of WP:BEFORE disturbing. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the Asheville Citizen-Times articles provided by BeanieFan11 above. Mooonswimmer 19:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per GNG. Just because he played just one game that the nominator regards as "unremarkable" does not mean we override GNG. Rlendog (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The coverage provided in this discussion is all WP:SIGCOV independent of the source, which results in the subject meeting the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 17:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: despite a single unremarkable game, satisfies WP:GNG due to its independent coverage. Waqar💬 14:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.