Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Savin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hyperseal. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 14:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Savin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He was a successful scientist, but I'm not seeing the coverage or significance to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found scarce evidence of notability, but hey, redirects are cheap. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hyperseal. I questioned the notability of Hyperseal at first, but it may barely pass WP:GNG with these two articles: [1], [2]. I can only find mention of Savin in articles about his invention. Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.