Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagu (soccer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 18:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sagu (soccer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm pretty sure this league, despite its name, doesn't meet NFOOTY. And he certainly doesn't meet GNG, sourced to a fan page and a dead link that'd be a primary source if it was working. Black Kite (talk) 07:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails W:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the PASL has a salary cap of $3000, meaning that this is not a fully professional league.[1] The subject fails WP:NFOOTY, and I can't find any meaningful media coverage (only routine stuff), so he fails the general notability criteria. ★ Bald Zebra ★ ^talk 09:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.