Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjana Sarathy

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 14:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjana Sarathy

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Sanjana Sarathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and it is a kind of WP:TOOSOON. The article is not meeting with WP:NPOV and has been written for promotional purposes. The article lacks reliable secondary sources. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The page seems to pass WP:GNG and I added another few links to reputable reviews and articles about the actress. Given that she's appeared in several films and one notable webseries in addition to other projects, I don't quite agree that it's WP:TOOSOON. I don't see where it fails WP:NPOV either, the writing is very much in keeping with Wikipedia standards (I've certainly never seen a press release that read that way). The only part which may have been inappropriate appeared to be the unnecessary detail about her mother, which I have since removed. IphisOfCrete (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep She passes WP:NACTOR. Please see this link) and (this link). in.com called her "Thupakki girl" and "Vaalu Star" and Firstpost called that her performance is spotted on the web series Fingertrip (let alone her other works). I think her these three important roles are enough for passing her WP:NACTOR.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete per nom. Sphinctor (talk) 06:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Sock !vote removed.[reply]
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete Weak Keep: I think it probably is a bit WP:TOOSOON, and I don't think WP:GNG is quite made out. There is a New Indian Express source and a Times of India source (both of which are contained in the article), which provide a little bit more than a passing mention—but I'm not sure about the reliability of Silverscreen, CinemaExpress, Firstpost and in.com. As these sources were brought up by IphisOfCrete and S. M. Nazmus Shakib, if they'd like to argue me over as to why these publications are reliable, I'll happily update my vote accordingly. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sanjana_Sarathy&oldid=943552107"