Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satnami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected as per below. When there are no objections to a redirect, even after a week, that's a good indication that someone could probably have just redirected the article without actually going through the AFD. If someone had objected to the mid-afd redirect, obviously it would have been reverted pending this discussion. Since it's been open for the required time, I'm going to go ahead and close this. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Satnami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant: Both Satnami and Sadh are synonymous. It may be redirected to Sadh AshLey ^Msg 13:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect seems right. There's nothing useful in this stub to merge over. This could have been done by ordinary editing.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirected for the time being, per the comment of alf laylah wa laylah. If the consensus is to retain the article, it could be reverted. AshLey ^Msg 11:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it OK to do this before the AFD closes, given that it removed the AFD template from the article? I'm not accusing; I legitimately don't know.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We have precedent like that (if it's not controversial). In a previous AFD discussion, I have observed such a move. AshLey ^Msg 13:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Okey dokey!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.