Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shramik Vikas Sangathan (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shramik Vikas Sangathan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails criteria laid down at WP:ORGCRITE. Lacks in-depth coverage, WP:CORPDEPTH. Run-of-the-mill routine news by WP:NEWSORGINDIA are inadequate. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, India, and Kerala. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Cut and paste mass nomination (nine in under 10 minutes), no apparatent WP:BEFORE; no indication what has changed since this was last nominated and kept. This is not a Kerala trade union, but rather the national labour wing of the Aam Adani Party; searching in Hindi "श्रमिक विकास संगठन" reveals multiple sourcing to satisfy the GNG. NB: WP:NEXIST. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 05:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- If similar articles have the same issue, you can cut and paste the same rationale. No big deal. Comment on the merit of the argument, not the person. Avoid ad hominem attacks and maintain civility. It's definitely a regional trade union of AAP in Kerala, and notability is not inherited. The sources are mere "routine announcements" or press releases from WP:NEWSORGINDIA. In India, any organization can pay to have news about their events published. Clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH - read it and compare. Gan Favourite (talk) 12:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- The organisation has multiple state level structures, but it is a national organisation, inherit has nothing to do with this. There's no discussion why the previous demonstration of notability should not stand. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 12:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- There are *41* sources posted on the article's talk page. To reiterate: no WP:BEFORE, WP:NEXIST. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 22:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- The organisation has multiple state level structures, but it is a national organisation, inherit has nothing to do with this. There's no discussion why the previous demonstration of notability should not stand. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 12:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- If similar articles have the same issue, you can cut and paste the same rationale. No big deal. Comment on the merit of the argument, not the person. Avoid ad hominem attacks and maintain civility. It's definitely a regional trade union of AAP in Kerala, and notability is not inherited. The sources are mere "routine announcements" or press releases from WP:NEWSORGINDIA. In India, any organization can pay to have news about their events published. Clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH - read it and compare. Gan Favourite (talk) 12:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep or Dratify – Reliable coverage seems to exist, but the article itself is in a sorry state. I would do a little expansion myself, but I cannot read the language the sources are in at all. Yue🌙 05:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.