Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Liberty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Solar Liberty) and redirect Rizzo article to it Black Kite (talk) 08:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Liberty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Liberty is a fairly smallish solar panel installation company near Buffalo. There are a couple of local press mentions and a listing in the 2008 Inc. investor's guide to small companies (but not any one after that). I don't think importance has been shown, nor can it be shown.

PROD removed by page author, so I'm bringing the article here. ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral, but I'm bringing here a related page for co-nomination:

-- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve Solar Liberty – This company has received significant coverage in reliable sources with regional coverage, including The Buffalo News, the primary newspaper of the Buffalo – Niagara Falls metropolitan area. (See [1] for information about The Buffalo News coverage in two counties, and readership statistics.) This topic is meeting WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG per: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] (there's more available). Mentions include: [8], [9]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, and not based upon whether or not sources are present in articles. See also WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep for Solar Liberty and Delete for Adam Rizzo. The company profile has enough references to enable its presence on Wikipedia, but Mr. Rizzo's biography does not meet the requirements of WP:BIO. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge verified information in Adam Rizzo to Solar Liberty, per WP:PRESERVE and to consolidate all information in one article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.