Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St.John Church of God in Christ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

St.John Church of God in Christ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:ORG. I looked through Google and couldn't find significant discussion of it in reliable sources, just notifications of events.

Versions have been sent to draft space several times but it continues to be placed in article space. Prod tag was removed by author. ... discospinster _talk 18:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 18:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 18:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, even speedily as a blatant advertisement. I also see no evidence of notability. Praxidicae (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this person is not the author of this page. i am. i have added links to this page. it ties in with another page in which it is referenced. i cannot add detailed history because of copyright claims but i added the link to the website pertaining to the history. i have also added links to the district related to the page and the organization. this is a legit place and the websites are legit. there is no reason to believe otherwise. i have also added facebook and youtube links. i have asked others not to bother this page as people have used it as a means to attack me personally. i have never had any issues with any pages i have contributed to that have been this extensive until now. i really am unappreciative of the way certain wikipedia contributors have handled this situation. it is fine if you delete a page but don't make it personal or use it as a means to attack a user for contributing and trying to assist you as you are the ones without the information and clearly in need of it. behavior like that makes users not want to assist. also please stop removing my edits and updates as you falsely accuse me when i remove yours.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Terricam (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, what even is this page? I see literally nothing about it online. Almost certainly fails WP:GNG. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You mean "inspires blah blah blah" doesn't inspire any confidence in you that it's notable??!?!?!?!?! Praxidicae (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see! How could I have been so blind? (sarcasm) TheAwesome Hwyh 20:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete absolutely fails WP:GNG. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would have to agree. This does not meet the notability guidelines, particularly the "Significant coverage", "Sources", and "Independent of the subject" guidelines.WP:GNG -- Courtc22 (talk) 22:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not have significant coverage for a stand-alone article. Kierzek (talk) 02:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - easily fails WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:12, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I see nothing in the article to show that this church is more notable than a host of other NN local churches. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.