Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star ng Pasko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 03:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Star ng Pasko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seven out of the ten sources listed in the "References" section are from publications that are unrelated to ABS-CBN Corporation, the company from which the article's song came from. The seven sources also manage to support in detail the context and significance of the song, while two out of the three sources from ABS-CBN News are almost ancillary in use except for the tenth source, which can easily be resolved. LionFosset (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per LionFosset. Drags4U (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2021
Keep Meets WP:NSONG per LionFosset's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 00:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the contributors' arguments are more convincing than that of the nominator, which almost isn't an argument at all. Geschichte (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per LionFosset. I think this article largely meets WP:NSONG with Special:Diff/1052996259. Nominator SeanJ 2007's argument was deemed incorrect and wrong. Chompy Ace 23:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.