Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Horse, Moon Horse
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 12:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sun Horse, Moon Horse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems like a prolific and notable author, but I can't find any references for this title to make me believe it meets WP:NBOOK. Mikeblas (talk) 14:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I found multiple reviews/notable mentions, including [1] and [2]. This book passes WP:BKCRIT. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- ^ http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7u7lb5eqwi0C&q=%22Sun+Horse,+Moon+Horse%22&dq=%22Sun+Horse,+Moon+Horse%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nWikU5qUK5LX7AaWjYDADQ&redir_esc=y
- ^ http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0ZkeAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Sun+Horse,+Moon+Horse%22&dq=%22Sun+Horse,+Moon+Horse%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nWikU5qUK5LX7AaWjYDADQ&redir_esc=y
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: It's a little slow going because of how long it's taking due to the time period, but I'm finding quite a bit to show that this book would pass notability guidelines. It seems to have been one of her more popular books, to be certain. ([1], [2], [3], [4]) A lot of what I'm finding shows that the book was used as an example of writing and language in children's fiction. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 19:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep—The google scholar hits look like good leads, as do the works that cite the book. On balance, I think there's enough here that notability is more likely than not. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.