Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Wornick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:BIODEL Wifione Message 08:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Wornick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced BLP, passed from PROD to here, I am neutral. Black Kite (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There are short news articles about her, but most seem to be prompted by a change of station. There is nothing that I can find that makes her notable among TV personalities. The page author Mooneyhill165 has created a number of pages for TV stations and a few for TV personalities. I assume that there is no exception for TV stations from WP:CORP, and that TV personalities must be notable as per WP:BLP. This author may need to review those guidelines to avoid putting in effort here that will just get deleted. LaMona (talk) 15:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.